ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN TABUNG GAS ELPIJI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 813/PID.B/2025/PN RAP)================ JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION IN IMPOSING CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON PERPETRATORS OF THEFT WITH AGGRAVATED LPG GAS CYLINDERS (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 813/PID.B/2025/PN RAP

SILVANA HERMAN, NPM 2202100001 (2026) ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN TABUNG GAS ELPIJI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 813/PID.B/2025/PN RAP)================ JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION IN IMPOSING CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON PERPETRATORS OF THEFT WITH AGGRAVATED LPG GAS CYLINDERS (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 813/PID.B/2025/PN RAP. Tugas Akhir (Artikel) Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6 (7). pp. 1-14. ISSN 27-46-4075(e-ISSN)

	Text COVER.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text ARTIKEL.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (342kB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 813/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap terkait tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan tabung gas elpiji 3 kg. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh unsur Pasal 363 ayat (2) KUHP telah terpenuhi, meliputi unsur mengambil barang milik orang lain, dilakukan pada malam hari, secara bersekutu, dan dengan cara merusak serta memanjat. Namun, penerapan pidana penjara dinilai kurang mempertimbangkan nilai kerugian yang kecil dan ketentuan Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012. Disimpulkan bahwa putusan telah memenuhi kepastian hukum, tetapi kurang mencerminkan keadilan dan kemanfaatan. Disarankan agar hakim lebih mengoptimalkan penerapan sanksi alternatif dalam perkara pidana ringan bermotif ekonomi. Kata Kunci: Analisis Yuridis, Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan, Pertimbangan Hakim, Sanksi Pidana ================================================================================================== This study analyzes the judge's considerations in Decision Number 813/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap regarding the crime of theft with aggravated 3 kg LPG gas cylinders. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and decision study. The results of the study indicate that all elements of Article 363 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled, including the element of taking someone else's property, carried out at night, in collusion, and by means of damage and climbing. However, the application of imprisonment is considered insufficient to consider the small value of the loss and the provisions of Perma Number 2 of 2012. It is concluded that the decision has fulfilled legal certainty, but does not reflect justice and benefit. It is recommended that judges optimize the application of alternative sanctions in minor criminal cases motivated by economic motives. Keywords: Legal Analysis, Aggravated Theft, Judge's Considerations, Criminal Sanctions

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Analisis Yuridis, Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan, Pertimbangan Hakim, Sanksi Pidana==============Legal Analysis, Aggravated Theft, Judge's Considerations, Criminal Sanctions
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id
Date Deposited:	05 May 2026 09:48
Last Modified:	07 May 2026 04:25
URI:	http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2218

Actions (login required)

View Item