KAJIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN HAKIM ATAS PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA PELAKU PEMALSUAN UANG RUPIAH PERSPEKTIF KRIMINOLOGI. STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR : 319/PID.B/2023/PN RAP===========================A LEGAL STUDY OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR COUNTERFEIT CURRENCY OFFENDERS FROM A CRIMINOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 319/PID.B/2023/PN RAP

SUHAIY BATUL ASLAMIYAH NST, NPM 2202100064 (2026) KAJIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN HAKIM ATAS PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA PELAKU PEMALSUAN UANG RUPIAH PERSPEKTIF KRIMINOLOGI. STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR : 319/PID.B/2023/PN RAP===========================A LEGAL STUDY OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR COUNTERFEIT CURRENCY OFFENDERS FROM A CRIMINOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 319/PID.B/2023/PN RAP. Tugas_Akhir(Artikel) Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6 (10). pp. 1-23. ISSN 2746-4075(e-ISSN)

	Text COVER.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text ARTIKEL.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (476kB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku pemalsuan uang Rupiah dalam Putusan Nomor 319/Pid.B/2023/PN Rap melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan perspektif kriminologi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim tepat menerapkan Pasal 36 ayat (1) UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 juncto Pasal 55 KUHP, dengan pembuktian terpenuhinya unsur perbuatan, kesalahan dan penyertaan. Pertimbangan pemidanaan mencerminkan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif dengan memperhatikan peran serta motif ekonomi terdakwa. Secara operasional, diperlukan penguatan koordinasi penegak hukum, optimalisasi teknologi deteksi uang palsu, serta peningkatan literasi keuangan masyarakat guna mencegah tindak pidana serupa. Kata Kunci: Hukum Progresif, Keadilan Substantif, Kriminologi, Pemalsuan Uang Rupiah, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana ================================================================ This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators of Rupiah counterfeiting in Decision Number 319/Pid.B/2023/PN Rap through a normative legal approach and a criminological perspective. The results indicate that the panel of judges correctly applied Article 36 paragraph (1) of Law Number 7 of 2011 in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code, by proving the fulfillment of the elements of the act, fault, and participation. The sentencing considerations reflect the balance between legal certainty and substantive justice, taking into account the defendant's role and economic motives. Operationally, it is necessary to strengthen law enforcement coordination, optimize counterfeit money detection technology, and improve public financial literacy to prevent similar crimes.. Keywords: Criminal Liability, Criminology, Counterfeiting of Rupiah, Progressive Law, Substantive Justice

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Hukum Progresif, Keadilan Substantif, Kriminologi, Pemalsuan Uang Rupiah, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana================Criminal Liability, Criminology, Counterfeiting of Rupiah, Progressive Law, Substantive Justice
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id
Date Deposited:	06 May 2026 01:54
Last Modified:	07 May 2026 04:51
URI:	http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2220

Actions (login required)

View Item