EVIDENTIARY LEGAL ASPECTS OF ORAL DEFAMATION COMMITTED IN PUBLIC : A STUDY OF AMLAPURA DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER NOMOR 64/PID.B/2020/PN AMP =================== ASPEK HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM KASUS PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK SECARA LISAN DI MUKA UMUM : STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI AMLAPURA NOMOR 64/PID.B/2020/PN AMP

FADLI ARMANDO, NPM 2202400089 (2026) EVIDENTIARY LEGAL ASPECTS OF ORAL DEFAMATION COMMITTED IN PUBLIC : A STUDY OF AMLAPURA DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER NOMOR 64/PID.B/2020/PN AMP =================== ASPEK HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM KASUS PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK SECARA LISAN DI MUKA UMUM : STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI AMLAPURA NOMOR 64/PID.B/2020/PN AMP. Tugas_Akhir (Artikel) : SIGn Jurnal Hukum (Sinta 4), 7 (2). pp. 1294-1307. ISSN 2685-8606 (e-ISSN) / 2685-8614 (e-ISSN)

	Text COVER.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text Jurnal B.Indonesia.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (725kB)
	Text Jurnal B.Inggris.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (293kB)

Abstract

The striking disparity between the Defendant’s resistance and the judge’s mitigating considerations in an oral defamation case constitutes a juridical anomaly. This condition fundamentally undermines legal certainty and the victim’s sense of justice. This research conducts a juridical review of Decision Number 64/Pid.B/2020/PN Amp. In said decision, the judge imposed a conditional sentence (probation) on a Defendant who, based on the evidence, was found to have refused to apologize to the victim. This research aims to analyze the evidentiary legal aspects in the fulfillment of the objective and subjective elements of the offense, as well as to test the validity of applying the conditional criminal sanction based on trial facts. The research method applied is normative legal research with a case approach and a statute approach to dissect the coherence between facts and norms. The results reveal a dualism in the quality of law enforcement. At the stage of proving guilt, the Panel of Judges successfully proved all elements of Article 310 section (1) of the Penal Code precisely based on valid evidence under Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, at the sentencing stage, the application of Article 14a of the Penal Code involves a serious internal logical defect (an internal contradiction). The material requirement of “behavioral prognosis” was based on assumptions of imaginary remorse and is opposed to the trial facts demonstrating a high degree of defiance. In conclusion, this decision contains an inconsistency in proving the subjective requirement, implying a high risk of supervision execution failure as stipulated in Article 276 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The research recommends the necessity for objectivity in remorse indicators within sentencing guidelines to prevent veiled impunity and maintain judicial authority. Keywords : Conditional Sentence; Court Decision; Defamation; Evidentiary Legal Aspects. =============================================================================================== Disparitas yang mencolok antara fakta sikap resisten Terdakwa dengan pertimbangan hakim yang meringankan dalam perkara pencemaran nama baik secara lisan merupakan anomali yuridis. Kondisi ini secara fundamental mencederai kepastian hukum dan rasa keadilan korban. Penelitian ini melakukan telaah yuridis terhadap Putusan Nomor 64/Pid.B/2020/PN Amp. Dalam putusan tersebut, hakim menjatuhkan pidana bersyarat kepada Terdakwa yang secara fakta hukum terbukti menolak meminta maaf kepada korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek hukum pembuktian dalam pemenuhan unsur objektif dan subjektif delik, serta menguji validitas penerapan sanksi pidana bersyarat berdasarkan fakta persidangan. Metode penelitian yang diterapkan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan untuk membedah koherensi antara fakta dan norma. Hasil penelitian mengungkap adanya dualisme kualitas penegakan hukum. Pada tahap pembuktian kesalahan, Majelis Hakim berhasil membuktikan seluruh unsur Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP secara presisi berdasarkan alat bukti sah Pasal 184 KUHAP. Namun, pada tahap pemidanaan, penerapan Pasal 14a KUHP mengandung cacat logika internal (internal contradiction) yang serius. Syarat materiil "prognosis perilaku" dibangun di atas asumsi penyesalan yang imajiner dan bertentangan diametral dengan fakta persidangan yang menunjukkan sikap menantang (high defiance). Kesimpulannya, putusan ini mengandung inkonsistensi pembuktian syarat subjektif yang berimplikasi pada tingginya risiko kegagalan eksekusi pengawasan sebagaimana diatur Pasal 276 KUHAP. Penelitian merekomendasikan perlunya objektivitas indikator penyesalan dalam pedoman pemidanaan untuk mencegah impunitas terselubung dan menjaga wibawa peradilan. Kata Kunci : Aspek Hukum Pembuktian; Pasal 310 KUHP; Pencemaran Nama Baik; Pidana Bersyarat; Putusan Pengadilan.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Conditional Sentence; Court Decision; Defamation; Evidentiary Legal Aspects. ================================ Aspek Hukum Pembuktian; Pasal 310 KUHP; Pencemaran Nama Baik; Pidana Bersyarat; Putusan Pengadilan.
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id
Date Deposited:	08 May 2026 03:17
Last Modified:	12 May 2026 04:18
URI:	http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2247

Actions (login required)

View Item