HENRYCO SIAHAAN, NPM 2202400109 (2026) LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 93 PARAGRAPH 1 BASED ON LAW NO. 45 OF 2009 CONCERNING FISHERIES (DECISION STUDY NO. 317/PID.SUS5/2013/PU. RHL) ================================================================================================= ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENERAPAN PASAL 93 AYAT 1 BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO.45 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERIKANAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.317/PID.SUS/2013/PU.RHL). Tugas_Akhir (Artikel) : International journal of humanities education and social sciences (SInta 4), 6 (1). pp. 19-22.
![[img]](http://repository.ulb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
COVER.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
Text
Jurnal B.Indonesia.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (663kB) |
|
Text
Jurnal B.Inggris.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (311kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of Article 93 paragraph (1) of Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries in Decision No. 317/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.RHL. The focus of the study is on proving the elements of the crime, the suitability of the evidence used, and the judge's legal considerations in issuing the decision. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of the study indicate that all elements of the crime regulated in Article 93 paragraph (1) have been fulfilled through valid evidence based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge in this case is considered to have applied the provisions of the article appropriately, both in terms of evidence and legal considerations. However, the decision still has weaknesses in terms of strengthening ecological aspects and deterrent effects on perpetrators of fisheries crimes. Therefore, a more comprehensive legal approach is needed that not only provides criminal sanctions, but also considers environmental losses and the need for sustainable protection of marine resources. Keywords : Legal Analysis; Court Decisions; Illegal Fishing and Proving the Elements of the Crime. ================================================================================================ Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan Pasal 93 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 45 Tahun 2009 tentang Perikanan dalam Putusan No. 317/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.RHL. Fokus kajian berada pada pembuktian unsur-unsur tindak pidana, kesesuaian alat bukti yang digunakan, serta pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh unsur tindak pidana yang diatur dalam Pasal 93 ayat (1) telah terpenuhi melalui pembuktian yang sah berdasarkan Pasal 184 KUHAP. Hakim dalam perkara ini dinilai telah menerapkan ketentuan pasal secara tepat, baik dari segi pembuktian maupun pertimbangan yuridis. Meskipun demikian, putusan masih memiliki kelemahan dalam hal penguatan aspek ekologis dan efek jera terhadap pelaku tindak pidana perikanan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan hukum yang lebih komprehensif yang tidak hanya memberikan sanksi pidana, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan kerugian lingkungan dan kebutuhan perlindungan sumber daya kelautan secara berkelanjutan. Keywords: Analisis Yuridis, Putusan Pengadilan, Illegal Fishing, Pembuktian Unsur Delik
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Legal Analysis; Court Decisions; Illegal Fishing and Proving the Elements of the Crime. ========================== Analisis Yuridis, Putusan Pengadilan, Illegal Fishing, Pembuktian Unsur Delik |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 11 May 2026 02:59 |
| Last Modified: | 11 May 2026 09:00 |
| URI: | http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2250 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
