JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIARY CRIMINAL ACTS IN ECSTASY TRANSACTIONS: A STUDY OF DUMAI DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER 188/PID.SUS/2025/PN DUM ============================================================================================== ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PERANTARA JUAL BELI EKSTASI: STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI DUMAI NOMOR 188/PID.SUS/2025/PN DUM

JOSUA SOTARDUGA PURBA, NPM 2202400116 (2026) JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIARY CRIMINAL ACTS IN ECSTASY TRANSACTIONS: A STUDY OF DUMAI DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER 188/PID.SUS/2025/PN DUM ============================================================================================== ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PERANTARA JUAL BELI EKSTASI: STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI DUMAI NOMOR 188/PID.SUS/2025/PN DUM. Tugas_Akhir(Artikel) : SIGn Jurnal Hukum (Sinta 4), 7 (2). pp. 1389-1402. ISSN 2685-8606 (e-ISSN) / 2685-8614 (p-ISSN)

	Text COVER.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text Jurnal B.Indonesia.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (613kB)
	Text Jurnal B.Inggris.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (290kB)

Abstract

Law enforcement in narcotics offenses frequently encounters a clash between the legal certainty of proving the elements of the offense and substantive justice in imposing criminal sanctions on subordinate intermediary offenders. Decision Number 188/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Dum imposed a six-year imprisonment and a fine of one billion rupiah on the Defendant. This research aims to examine the accuracy of the Panel of Judges’ legal qualification in applying the elements of an intermediary in narcotics transactions and to critically analyze the proportionality of criminal sanctions based on the offender’s degree of culpability. This normative legal research utilizes the statute approach and the case approach, employing an analytical-prescriptive analysis technique through a legal syllogism. The results indicate that the Panel of Judges absolutely and accurately applied the substantive law of Article 114 section (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 by considering the defendant’s active initiative in facilitating the transaction. In the sentencing dimension, the decision was proportionate and objective. The Panel of Judges did not merely take refuge behind the minimum sanction limits, but comprehensively differentiated roles by rejecting the narrative of sociological excusability regarding the defendant’s factual position as a field operator. In conclusion, the conviction is normatively valid and successfully presents substantive justice grounded in the individual’s degree of culpability. As a policy implication, the Supreme Court is recommended to immediately formulate sentencing guidelines for narcotics offenses that are hierarchically binding to maintain the consistency of high-quality legal reasoning across all judicial levels. Keywords : Degree Of Culpability; Ecstasy Transactions; Judge’s Legal Reasoning; Narcotics Intermediary; Sentencing Proportionality. =============================================================================================== Penegakan hukum tindak pidana narkotika kerap berbenturan antara kepastian hukum pembuktian unsur delik dan keadilan substantif dalam penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku perantara subordinat. Putusan Nomor 188/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Dum menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama enam tahun dan pidana denda sebesar satu miliar rupiah terhadap Terdakwa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji ketepatan kualifikasi hukum Majelis Hakim dalam menerapkan unsur perantara jual beli narkotika serta menganalisis secara kritis proporsionalitas sanksi pidana berdasarkan tingkat kesalahan pelaku. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, dengan teknik analisis preskriptif analitis melalui silogisme hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim telah secara mutlak dan akurat menerapkan hukum materiil Pasal 114 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 dengan mempertimbangkan inisiatif aktif terdakwa dalam memfasilitasi transaksi. Pada dimensi pemidanaan, putusan tersebut terbukti proporsional dan objektif. Majelis Hakim tidak sekadar berlindung di balik batas sanksi minimum, melainkan melakukan diferensiasi peran secara komprehensif dengan menolak narasi pemakluman sosiologis atas posisi faktual terdakwa sebagai pelaksana lapangan. Kesimpulannya, putusan pemidanaan tersebut sah secara normatif dan berhasil menghadirkan keadilan substantif yang bertumpu pada derajat kesalahan individu. Sebagai implikasi kebijakan, Mahkamah Agung direkomendasikan untuk segera merumuskan pedoman pemidanaan tindak pidana narkotika yang mengikat secara berjenjang guna menjaga konsistensi penalaran hukum yang berkualitas di seluruh tingkat peradilan. Kata Kunci : Jual Beli Ekstasi; Kualifikasi Tingkat Kesalahan; Perantara Narkotika; Pertimbangan Hakim; Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Degree Of Culpability; Ecstasy Transactions; Judge’s Legal Reasoning; Narcotics Intermediary; Sentencing Proportionality. ================================================ Jual Beli Ekstasi; Kualifikasi Tingkat Kesalahan; Perantara Narkotika; Pertimbangan Hakim; Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan.
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id
Date Deposited:	11 May 2026 08:46
Last Modified:	11 May 2026 08:56
URI:	http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2267

Actions (login required)

View Item