ANALISIS PENERAPAN HUKUM DAN RATIO DECIDENDI HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 431/PID.B/2025/PN RAP)

ALFAN SUBAKTI, NPM 2202500161 (2026) ANALISIS PENERAPAN HUKUM DAN RATIO DECIDENDI HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 431/PID.B/2025/PN RAP). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Labuhanbatu.

[img] Text
COVER.pdf
Download (534kB)
[img] Text
BAB I.pdf
Download (81kB)
[img] Text
BAB II.pdf
Download (155kB)
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (122kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (238kB)
[img] Text
BAB V.pdf
Download (17kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (15kB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik serta ratio decidendi hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat Nomor 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP dalam perkara a quo telah dilakukan secara tepat. Majelis Hakim menyatakan terdakwa Matio Situmorang terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik karena telah dengan sengaja menuduhkan korban sebagai Parbegu Ganjang di hadapan masyarakat sehingga menyerang kehormatan dan nama baik korban. Pembuktian dilakukan melalui keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli bahasa, barang bukti elektronik, dan fakta hukum yang terungkap di persidangan. Ratio decidendi hakim dalam putusan tersebut tidak hanya didasarkan pada pemenuhan unsur-unsur Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan aspek sosial dan budaya masyarakat Batak. Hakim menilai bahwa istilah Parbegu Ganjang memiliki konotasi negatif yang menimbulkan stigma sosial terhadap korban. Pertimbangan tersebut sejalan dengan Pasal 5 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang mewajibkan hakim menggali nilai-nilai hukum dan rasa keadilan yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Pencemaran Nama Baik, Pasal 310 KUHP, Ratio Decidendi, Budaya Batak, Parbegu Ganjang ================================================================================================== This study aims to analyze the application of law and the judge's ratio decidendi in deciding criminal defamation cases, particularly in the Decision of the Rantauprapat District Court Number 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the application of Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) in this case was appropriate and in accordance with the prevailing legal provisions. The panel of judges found the defendant, Matio Situmorang, legally and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of defamation by intentionally accusing the victim of being a Parbegu Ganjang in front of members of the community, thereby attacking the victim’s honor and reputation. The conviction was based on witness testimonies, expert testimony, electronic evidence, and facts revealed during the trial. The judge’s ratio decidendi was not only based on the fulfillment of the elements of Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code but also on sociological and cultural considerations within the Batak community. The judges considered that the term Parbegu Ganjang carries a negative connotation and social stigma that can damage a person's reputation and social standing. This consideration is consistent with Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, which requires judges to explore, follow, and understand the legal values and sense of justice living within society. This decision demonstrates that criminal defamation may arise not only through electronic media but also through direct accusations associated with local beliefs and cultural values. Therefore, the application of criminal law should take into account the socio-cultural context of the community to ensure effective protection of an individual's honor and reputation. Keywords: Defamation, Article 310 Of The Criminal Code, Ratio Decidendi, Judicial Reasoning, Batak Culture, Parbegu Ganjang

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Pencemaran Nama Baik, Pasal 310 KUHP, Ratio Decidendi, Budaya Batak, Parbegu Ganjang=============Defamation, Article 310 Of The Criminal Code, Ratio Decidendi, Judicial Reasoning, Batak Culture, Parbegu Ganjang
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id
Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2026 07:50
Last Modified: 22 Jul 2026 07:50
URI: http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2603

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
ulb is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.