ENJAN TINOPEL ALEXSANDER SAMOSIR, NPM 2102100030 (2025) ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN ( STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PUTUSAN NOMOR 663/PID.B/2021/PN RAP). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Labuhanbatu.
![[img]](http://repository.ulb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
COVER.pdf Download (707kB) |
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (381kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (498kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Download (362kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Download (371kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (210kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (296kB) |
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kualifikasi terkait tindak pidana pemerkosaan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, dan pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap tindak pidana menyerang kehormatan susila study kasus : pengadilan negeri putusan nomor 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Dengan hasil penelitian Putusan Nomor : 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap, dasar pertimbangan hakim baik seicara yuridis dan noin-yuridis telah sesuai dengan dakwaan. Karena dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan tersebut mempertimbangkan hal-hal pada pertimbangan yuridis, fakta-fakta dalam persidangan dan pertimbangan sosiologis. Pertimbangan hakim memutuskan lebih ringan dari tuntutan jaksa ialah karena terdapat hal-hal yang meringankan. Mengenai sanksi pidana yang diberikan kepada terdakwa lebih ringan dari penuntut jaksa karena adanya hal-hal yang meringankan yang didapatkan dalam persidangan, yaitu terdakwa berlaku sopan dipersidangan dan terdakwa belum pernah dihukum sebelumnya, serta terdakwa merasa bersalah dan mengakui dengan terus terang perbuatannya serta berjanji tidak akan mengulanginya kembali. Kata Kunci : Putusan Hakim, Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan, Putusan Nomor 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap ================================================================================================== The purpose of this study is to determine the qualifications related to the crime of rape in Indonesian laws and regulations, and the legal considerations used by judges in issuing decisions regarding the crime of assaulting moral honor. Case study: District Court Decision Number 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap. The research method used is normative juridical. Based on the results of the study of Decision Number 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap, the judge's considerations, both juridical and non-juridical, are in accordance with the indictment. The judge's decision was based on legal considerations, trial facts, and sociological considerations. The judge's decision to sentence the defendant less severely than the prosecutor's demand was based on mitigating circumstances. The criminal sanction imposed on the defendant was less severe than the prosecutor's due to mitigating circumstances established during the trial, including the defendant's polite behavior during the trial, his prior convictions, and his guilt, openly admitting his actions and promising not to repeat them. Keywords: Judge's Decision, Rape, Decision Number 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Putusan Hakim, Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan, Putusan Nomor 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap============Judge's Decision, Rape, Decision Number 663/PID.B/2021/PN Rap |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Oct 2025 03:13 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2025 03:13 |
| URI: | http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/1887 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
