ANNISA PRATIWI, NPM 2202100012 (2026) ANALISIS HUKUM TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN STIGMA PARBEGU GANJANG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 431/PID.B/2025/PN.RAP). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Labuhanbatu.
![[img]](http://repository.ulb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
COVER.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (180kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (287kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (35kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (121kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (11kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (97kB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap korban stigma kepercayaan supernatural Parbegu Ganjang serta mengkaji dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pada perkara pencemaran nama baik dalam Putusan Nomor 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini meliputi bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi korban stigma Parbegu Ganjang di Indonesia serta bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach), yaitu dengan menganalisis putusan pengadilan sebagai objek utama penelitian. Data yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap korban stigma Parbegu Ganjang dalam sistem hukum Indonesia secara normatif telah diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, seperti Undang Undang Dasar 1945, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, serta Undang Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Namun, dalam praktiknya perlindungan tersebut belum sepenuhnya optimal, khususnya dalam aspek pemulihan nama baik dan perlindungan psikologis korban. Dalam Putusan Nomor 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap, Majelis Hakim menyatakan terdakwa terbukti bersalah melakukan tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP, karena telah secara sengaja menuduh korban sebagai Parbegu Ganjang di hadapan umum. Meskipun putusan tersebut telah memberikan kepastian hukum dengan menjatuhkan pidana kepada terdakwa selama 5 (lima) bulan dengan penetapan pidana tersebut tidak usah dijalani kecuali jika dikemudian hari ada putusan hakim yang menentukan lain disebabkan karena terpidana melakukan suatu tindak pidana sebelum masa percobaan selama 1 (satu) tahun berakhir, namun dari perspektif perlindungan korban, putusan tersebut masih belum memberikan keadilan yang optimal karena tidak disertai dengan upaya pemulihan nama baik maupun kompensasi terhadap korban. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi dan implementasi perlindungan hukum yang lebih komprehensif bagi korban stigma sosial berbasis kepercayaan supernatural di Indonesia. Kata kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Korban Stigma Parbegu Ganjang, Pencemaran Nama Baik ======================================================================= This study aims to analyze the legal protection for victims of stigma related to the supernatural belief known as Parbegu Ganjang, as well as to examine the legal considerations of judges in rendering decisions in defamation cases, particularly in Decision Number 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap. The issues addressed in this study include how legal protection is provided to victims of Parbegu Ganjang stigma in Indonesia and how judges consider legal aspects in adjudicating such cases. The research method used is normative legal research with a case approach, which involves analyzing court decisions as the primary object of study. The data used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research, which are then analyzed qualitatively to answer the research problems. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for victims of Parbegu Ganjang stigma within the Indonesian legal system has been normatively regulated in various laws and regulations, such as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Indonesian Criminal Code, and the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. However, in practice, such protection has not been fully optimal, particularly in terms of restoring the victim’s reputation and providing psychological protection.In Decision Number 431/Pid.B/2025/PN Rap, the panel of judges declared the defendant guilty of committing the crime of defamation as regulated under Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, as the defendant intentionally accused the victim of being a Parbegu Ganjang in public. Although the decision has provided legal certainty by sentencing the defendant to five (5) months of imprisonment with a probationary period of one (1) year, meaning that the sentence does not need to be served unless the defendant commits another criminal offense during the probation period, from the perspective of victim protection, the decision has not yet provided optimal justice. This is because it does not include efforts to restore the victim’s reputation nor provide compensation to the victim. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen both the regulation and implementation of more comprehensive legal protection for victims of social stigma based on supernatural beliefs in Indonesia. Keywords: Legal Protection, Victims of Parbegu Ganjang Stigma, Defamation
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Perlindungan Hukum, Korban Stigma Parbegu Ganjang, Pencemaran Nama Baik==============Legal Protection, Victims of Parbegu Ganjang Stigma, Defamation |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repository@ulb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Jun 2026 07:29 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Jun 2026 07:29 |
| URI: | http://repository.ulb.ac.id/id/eprint/2568 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
